Blog Archives
Poll: Who’s Behind Sarah Palin’s “Emailgate”?
This is poll-worthy. I have never conducted a poll before, but is interesting that I haven’t seen one around in the blogosphere that I know of. So here it goes. Someone (or some organization) has fed the media with some bait; they’re fishing for anything that could damage Sarah Palin.
There’s two things I want to throw out there. One: If Sarah Palin does the media rounds, what are they gonna ask her? I mean, they got all the answers already!Two: Will the final GOP official candidate (if it’s not Sarah) get the same love scrutiny?
A “Palin-Free?” February? I Don’t Think So!
In an attempt from the media to regain their credibility after disastrous years they have taken a Carthusians‘ gown and bestowed themselves with a vow of silence. A vow to stay away from anything Palin during the whole month of February-the shortest month of the year. As easy as quitting smoking, cold turkey.
Yeah, yeah, Obama has nothing to do with this…that we know of. Progressives’ ammo in Alaska and nationwide is running out, and his call to civility and avoid political rhetoric that he asked for in Arizona hasn’t stopped His Loyal Servants from tossing false information.
So let the Washington Post lead the way, to start on February 1st. Will they make it to the 28th? Or does this apply (conveniently) to just Dana Milbank and not the other media outlets?
The Washington Post is engaging in online political activism by encouraging its readers to boycott news coverage of Sarah Palin.
The Post has picked up the call initiated this morning by Post columnist Dana Milbank, adding a Twitter link on the column page. The link generates a message to be sent from a Twitter member’s page that reads, “I’m making February a Palin-free month. Will you join me?”
The Post added the Twitter link to Milbank’s column this afternoon, several hours after running and pulling a Washington Post online poll about boycotting Sarah Palin news coverage. The poll initially accompanied The Post’s Milbank op-ed but was pulled within hours of publication at WashingtonPost.com.
The poll, which questioned Post readers whether they would support a Palin news boycott, received the support of eighty percent of approximately 450 votes cast.
“Post columnist Dana Milbank has pledged not to write anything about Sarah Palin for one month. Would you pledge not read or watch coverage of Palin for one month?”
Yes: 70%; I’ll try: 10%; No: 20%.
Related Articles
- Take The Palin Pledge (outsidethebeltway.com)
- Columnist calls for ‘Palin-free February’ (upi.com)
- Go Palin-Free in February (feministphilosophers.wordpress.com)
- A Palin-Free February? (andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com)
- Washington Post Organizes News Boycott of Sarah Palin; Starts Twitter Campaign Against GOP Star (bigjournalism.com)
- Columnist proposes Feb. as “Palin-free month” (seattlepi.com)
- WaPo’s Dana Milbank Suggests To His Media Cohorts A Sarah Palin-Free Month (mediaite.com)
- Washington Post Now Not Even Trying To Hide Its Hatred Of Sarah Palin (legalinsurrection.blogspot.com)
- WaPo columnist: Hey, let’s make February “Nobody Write About Palin Month” (hotair.com)















